Episodes

For Lincoln’s birthday month this year, we unpack Biblical themes in a crucial speech he gave at the end of his life where he interprets the Civil War entirely in Biblical terms.

The Republican Professor is a pro-correctly understanding the Bible and Politics podcast.

Therefore, welcome our first Republican president to the podcast, Abraham Lincoln.

The Republican Professor is produced and hosted by Dr. Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D.

We begin our study of Justice Scalia’s great dissent in Morrison v. Olson (1988) and what it teaches us about Separation of Powers as established by the Constitution of the United States of America.

Part 1.

Next time, we get to Roman numeral one and beyond.

The Republican Professor is a pro-Separation-of-Powers-rightly-understood-executive-power-correctly-contemplated podcast.

Therefore, welcome Justice Antonin Scalia to the podcast.

The Republican Professor is produced and hosted by Dr. Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D.

To support the podcast, support it.

Warmly,

Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D.

The Republican Professor Podcast
The Republican Professor Newsletter on Substack
https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/podcast/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/articles/
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublicanProfessor
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRepublicanProfessor
Twitter: @RepublicanProf
Instagram: @the_republican_professor

Michael M. Uhlmann was my mentor for over a decade. Here we cover his 1978 essay which sounds as if he’s talking about February 2025.

The essay is called “Congress and the Welfare State.” It’s a review of Morris Fiorina’s book Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment.

Enjoy !

The Republican Professor is a pro-Michael-M-Uhlmann podcast !

The Republican Professor is produced and hosted by Dr. Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D., Michael M. Uhlmann’s student.

To support the podcast, support it.

Warmly,

Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D.

The Republican Professor Podcast
The Republican Professor Newsletter on Substack
https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/podcast/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/articles/
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublicanProfessor
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRepublicanProfessor
Twitter: @RepublicanProf
Instagram: @the_republican_professor

We continue in our study of the Fourth Amendment civil liberties.

This is Part 4 of an analysis of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (US) in Pasadena on Snitko v. United States (FBI), a Fourth Amendment search and seizure “inventory” case. 90 F.4th 1250 (9th Cir, 2024).

The Republican Professor is a pro-correctly-discerning-when-government-uses-administrative-law-to-break-Constitutional-law podcast.

Support the podcast with a gift:

https://buymeacoffee.com/lucasj.mather

or on Venmo at-sign TheRepublicanProfessor

Warmly,

Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D.

The Republican Professor Podcast
The Republican Professor Newsletter on Substack
https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/podcast/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/articles/
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublicanProfessor
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRepublicanProfessor
Twitter: @RepublicanProf
Instagram: @the_republican_professor

What hath Individual Liberty to do with proper and correct, univocal definitions of terms ?

For Part 4 of this deep dive where we will go through the famous Chevron USA v. Natural Resource Defense Council (1984) Roman Numerals III through V. Recall, this decision reversed the Ginsburg opinion at the lower court.

This in turn sets us up for Part 3, where we’ll look closely at Loper Bright (2024), which in turn reversed the Republican win in 1984.

This could be called Gorsuch v. Gorsuch, like Kramer v. Kramer but son v. Mother instead of spouses.

Donate a gift to keep the podcast going on Venmo at-sign no space TheRepublicanProfessor

or

https://buymeacoffee.com/lucasj.mather

Warmly,

Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D.

The Republican Professor Podcast
The Republican Professor Newsletter on Substack
https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/podcast/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/articles/
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublicanProfessor
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRepublicanProfessor
Twitter: @RepublicanProf
Instagram: @the_republican_professor

Are you ready to get your Separation of Powers on ?

For Part 3 of this deep dive where we will go through the famous Chevron USA v. Natural Resource Defense Council (1984) Roman Numerals III through V. Recall, this decision reversed the Ginsburg opinion at the lower court.

This in turn sets us up for Part 3, where we’ll look closely at Loper Bright (2024), which in turn reversed the Republican win in 1984.

This could be called Gorsuch v. Gorsuch, like Kramer v. Kramer but son v. Mother instead of spouses.

Epiphany 2025

Luke, for TRP

Donate a gift to keep the podcast going on Venmo at-sign no space TheRepublicanProfessor

Are you ready to get your Separation of Powers on ?

For Part 2 of this deep dive where we will go through the famous Chevron USA v. Natural Resource Defense Council (1984), which reversed the Ginsburg opinion at the lower court.

This in turn sets us up for Part 3, where we’ll look closely at Loper Bright (2024), which in turn reversed the Republican win in 1984.

This could be called Gorsuch v. Gorsuch, like Kramer v. Kramer but son v. Mother instead of spouses.

Epiphany 2025

Luke, for TRP

Donate a gift to keep the podcast going on Venmo at-sign no space TheRepublicanProfessor

Longtime caller, first time listener CS Snodtgrass, or Clive Staples Snodtgrass Jr. for short (dad’s name is Fred) finally gets through to the TRP Podcast. Clive joins us to celebrate being a Gay American and a Gay Republican and enjoy the inauguration of President Trump for the second time.

We also discuss, briefly, the ant-Gay policies of the Democratic Party in California in the present day.

It’s 20 Jan 2025 , Monday, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s birthday holiday.

Are you ready to get your Fourth Amendment on ?

This is Part 3 of an analysis of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (US) in Pasadena on Snitko v. United States (FBI), a Fourth Amendment search and seizure “inventory” case.

The Republican Professor is a pro-correctly-discerning-when-government-uses-administrative-law-to-break-Constitutional-law podcast.

Support the podcast with a gift:

https://buymeacoffee.com/lucasj.mather

or on Venmo at-sign TheRepublicanProfessor

Warmly,

Lucas J. Mather, Ph.D.

The Republican Professor Podcast
The Republican Professor Newsletter on Substack
https://therepublicanprofessor.substack.com/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/podcast/
https://www.therepublicanprofessor.com/articles/
YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublicanProfessor
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheRepublicanProfessor
Twitter: @RepublicanProf
Instagram: @the_republican_professor

This is not for the faint of heart.
It’s a deep dive into Chevron deference doctrine starting with Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s DC Circuit opinion in 1982 against Anne Gorsuch, Neil Gorsuch’s mother, who was at the time appointed by Republican Ronald Reagan to run the Environmental Protection Agency.

We cover Ginsburg’s 1982 decision here in Part 1.
This sets us up for Part 2 of this deep dive where we will go through the famous Chevron USA v. Natural Resource Defense Council (1984), which reversed the Ginsburg opinion at the lower court.

This in turn sets us up for Part 3, where we’ll look closely at Loper Bright (2024), which in turn reversed the Republican win in 1984.

This could be called Gorsuch v. Gorsuch, like Kramer v. Kramer but son v. Mother instead of spouses.

Merry Christmas season to you from Trp.

Luke, for TRP

Donate on Venmo at-sign no space TheRepublicanProfessor